On 7/30/21 7:48 PM, Baokun Li wrote:If user specify a large enough value of NBD blocks option, it may trigger signed integer overflow which may lead to nbd->config->bytesize becomes a large or small value, zero in particular. UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in drivers/block/nbd.c:325:31 signed integer overflow: 1024 * 4611686155866341414 cannot be represented in type 'long long int' [...] Call trace: [...] handle_overflow+0x188/0x1dc lib/ubsan.c:192 __ubsan_handle_mul_overflow+0x34/0x44 lib/ubsan.c:213 nbd_size_set drivers/block/nbd.c:325 [inline] __nbd_ioctl drivers/block/nbd.c:1342 [inline] nbd_ioctl+0x998/0xa10 drivers/block/nbd.c:1395 __blkdev_driver_ioctl block/ioctl.c:311 [inline] [...] Although it is not a big deal, still silence the UBSAN by limit the input value. Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com> --- drivers/block/nbd.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c index c38317979f74..7c838bf8cc31 100644 --- a/drivers/block/nbd.c +++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c @@ -1398,6 +1398,8 @@ static int __nbd_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, struct nbd_device *nbd, case NBD_SET_SIZE: return nbd_set_size(nbd, arg, config->blksize); case NBD_SET_SIZE_BLOCKS: + if (arg && (LLONG_MAX / arg <= config->blksize)) + return -EINVAL;Use check_mul_overflow() instead?
Thank you for your advice.
I'm about to send a patch v2 with the changes suggested by you.
-- With Best Regards, Baokun Li