Re: [PATCH 1/2] doc: Clarify maximum size limits
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 04:18:20PM +0300, Edgar Kaziakhmedov wrote:
> On 03/01/2018 02:20 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> > +If block size constraints have not been advertised or agreed on
> > +externally, then a server SHOULD support a default minimum block size
> > +of 1, a preferred block size of 2^12 (4,096), and a maximum block size
> > +of the smaller of the export size or 0xffffffff (effectively
>
> Shouldn't we use here 'and' instead of 'or'? At the first glance, it is not
> clear with 'or'.
No, that's how you do it in English :-)
This looks correct to me, but if someone has a way of clarifying that
even further, I won't object...
--
Could you people please use IRC like normal people?!?
-- Amaya Rodrigo Sastre, trying to quiet down the buzz in the DebConf 2008
Hacklab
Reply to: