Re: [Nbd] [PATCH] Further tidy-up on block status
- To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@...2319...>
- Cc: "nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net" <nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net>, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@...696...>, "Denis V . Lunev" <den@...2317...>, "qemu-devel@...530..." <qemu-devel@...530...>, Pavel Borzenkov <pborzenkov@...2319...>, "Stefan stefanha@...2321... com" <stefanha@...696...>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...696...>, Markus Pargmann <mpa@...1897...>, Wouter Verhelst <w@...112...>, John Snow <jsnow@...696...>
- Subject: Re: [Nbd] [PATCH] Further tidy-up on block status
- From: Alex Bligh <alex@...872...>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 13:16:35 +0000
- Message-id: <C834A65C-57A2-4863-ACE7-2009BD3C4B02@...872...>
- In-reply-to: <ac0cc1e5-dea5-ba2d-2789-7dd0672ad561@...2319...>
- References: <20161214150840.10899-1-alex@...872...> <ac0cc1e5-dea5-ba2d-2789-7dd0672ad561@...2319...>
> On 12 Jan 2017, at 11:43, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@...2723...9...> wrote:
>
> From "NBD_OPT_LIST_META_CONTEXT (9)":
>> The server MUST either reply with an error (for instance EINVAL if the option is not supported), or reply with a list of NBD_REP_META_CONTEXT replies followed by NBD_REP_ACK.:
> NBD_REP_ERR_UNSUP for the case in braces? Should it be normal option reply packet?
Thanks, fixed.
--
Alex Bligh
Reply to: