Re: [Nbd] [PATCH] Further tidy-up on block status

[Alex Bligh <alex@...872...>]

> On 12 Jan 2017, at 07:05, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@...2723...9...> wrote:
> 
> Yes this is better. But is it actually needed to force contexts have some safe default? If context wants it may define such default without this requirement.. So, should it be requirement at all?

I've changed this to:

    of the file), a server MAY reply with a single block status
    descriptor with *length* matching the requested length, rather than
    reporting the error; in this case the context MAY mandate the
    status returned.


-- 
Alex Bligh