Re: [Nbd] [PATCH v4 1/5]nbd: cleanup nbd_set_socket

[Pranay Srivastava <pranjas@...17...>]

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Pranay Srivastava <pranjas@...17...> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Pranay Kr. Srivastava
> <pranjas@...17...> wrote:
>> From: "Pranay Kr. Srivastava" <pranaykumar.srivastava@...2411...>
>>
>> This patch
>> 1) uses spin_lock instead of irq version.
>>
>> 2) removes the goto statement in case a socket
>>    is already assigned with simple if-else statement.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pranay Kr. Srivastava <pranjas@...17...>
>> ---
>>  drivers/block/nbd.c | 15 +++++----------
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c
>> index 56f7f5d..766c401 100644
>> --- a/drivers/block/nbd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c
>> @@ -643,17 +643,12 @@ static int nbd_set_socket(struct nbd_device *nbd, struct socket *sock)
>>  {
>>         int ret = 0;
>>
>> -       spin_lock_irq(&nbd->sock_lock);
>> -
>> -       if (nbd->sock) {
>> +       spin_lock(&nbd->sock_lock);
>> +       if (nbd->sock)
>>                 ret = -EBUSY;
>> -               goto out;
>> -       }
>> -
>> -       nbd->sock = sock;
>> -
>> -out:
>> -       spin_unlock_irq(&nbd->sock_lock);
>> +       else
>> +               nbd->sock = sock;
>> +       spin_unlock(&nbd->sock_lock);
>>
>>         return ret;
>>  }
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>
> Hi Markus,
>
> Did you get a chance to review V4 of this series.
>
> --
>         ---P.K.S

Ping ?

-- 
        ---P.K.S