Re: [Nbd] [PATCHv2] Docs: improve description of disconnection methods
- To: Alex Bligh <alex@...872...>
- Cc: "nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net" <nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net>
- Subject: Re: [Nbd] [PATCHv2] Docs: improve description of disconnection methods
- From: Wouter Verhelst <w@...112...>
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 08:30:33 +0200
- Message-id: <20160415063033.GC5515@...3...>
- In-reply-to: <1460659928-26500-1-git-send-email-alex@...872...>
- References: <1460659928-26500-1-git-send-email-alex@...872...>
Hi Alex,
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 07:52:08PM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote:
> +* `NBD_REP_ERR_SHUTDOWN` (2^32 + 7)
> +
> + The server is unwilling to continue negotiation as it has been
> + shut down.
is shutting down?
('has been' is past tense, at which point it cannot send anything
anymore)
[...]
> @@ -960,6 +1057,7 @@ The following error values are defined:
> * `ENOSPC` (28), No space left on device.
> * `EOVERFLOW` (75), Value too large; SHOULD NOT be sent outside of the
> experimental `STRUCTURED_REPLY` extension; see below.
> +* `ESHUTDOWN` (108), Server has been shut down.
Same here.
[...]
--
< ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem with C++, is there's like a dozen
people in the world who think they really understand all of its rules,
and pretty much all of them are just lying to themselves too.
-- #debian-devel, OFTC, 2016-02-12
Reply to: