Re: [Nbd] [PATCH] Docs: improve description of disconnection methods
- To: Alex Bligh <alex@...872...>
- Cc: "nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net" <nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net>
- Subject: Re: [Nbd] [PATCH] Docs: improve description of disconnection methods
- From: Wouter Verhelst <w@...112...>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 08:51:57 +0200
- Message-id: <20160414065157.GD4825@...3...>
- In-reply-to: <0348C152-A544-4D21-A4A6-68D575B9C4CA@...872...>
- References: <1460489493-56551-1-git-send-email-alex@...872...> <20160413072209.GC19351@...3...> <75B045B2-1D1D-4F27-9EAC-B342DDF28EE3@...872...> <570E6832.1000100@...696...> <0348C152-A544-4D21-A4A6-68D575B9C4CA@...872...>
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 05:09:49PM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote:
[...]
> On 13 Apr 2016, at 16:39, Eric Blake <eblake@...696...> wrote:
> > and at the same time that a client SHOULD wait until
> > there are no inflight commands before sending NBD_CMD_DISC.
>
> I like that. I think Wouter doesn't.
I'm less opposed to SHOULD than I am to MUST, but I don't think it's
necessary.
[...]
--
< ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem with C++, is there's like a dozen
people in the world who think they really understand all of its rules,
and pretty much all of them are just lying to themselves too.
-- #debian-devel, OFTC, 2016-02-12
Reply to: