Re: [Nbd] [PATCHv8] Improve documentation for TLS
- To: Wouter Verhelst <w@...112...>
- Cc: "nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net" <nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net>, "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@...696...>, "qemu-devel@...530..." <qemu-devel@...530...>
- Subject: Re: [Nbd] [PATCHv8] Improve documentation for TLS
- From: Alex Bligh <alex@...872...>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 14:29:00 +0100
- Message-id: <4313A5E7-16DD-4678-81D2-497F897BA319@...872...>
- In-reply-to: <20160412130119.GB15484@...3...>
- References: <20160411061013.GE28660@...3...> <4942E119-AFFA-42B4-A6DF-2BD6F729D84D@...872...> <570C059E.6090000@...696...> <ECBAC2D7-160B-4E86-A469-00594CB45910@...872...> <20160412060155.GF4281@...3...> <0D0FC6E7-F6DA-4B70-A2DD-66ADCD038CA2@...872...> <20160412092058.GA30686@...3...> <ACE271FF-7D80-48CD-A044-780AC6AC4EF9@...872...> <20160412124055.GA15484@...3...> <C360E6E8-F9EA-4455-B151-D9AB387CAC95@...872...> <20160412130119.GB15484@...3...>
Wouter,
On 12 Apr 2016, at 14:01, Wouter Verhelst <w@...112...> wrote:
> It's not being applied because of this ;-)
OK, I've sent a PATCHv9 with my suggested wording (so at least
it doesn't make anything worse), but I really think we should
avoid addressing further nits in the disconnection regime within
a change which is meant to be documenting TLS.
Alex
> I can probably apply it and then work on the clarification of that
> paragraph, I suppose, but I'd prefer doing it right from the get go.
--
Alex Bligh
Reply to: