Re: [Nbd] [RFC PATCH 00/18] NBD protocol additions
- To: Eric Blake <eblake@...696...>
- Cc: nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net, qemu-devel@...530...
- Subject: Re: [Nbd] [RFC PATCH 00/18] NBD protocol additions
- From: Wouter Verhelst <w@...112...>
- Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 12:21:36 +0200
- Message-id: <20160409102136.GK19023@...3...>
- In-reply-to: <1460153158-21612-1-git-send-email-eblake@...696...>
- References: <1460153158-21612-1-git-send-email-eblake@...696...>
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 04:05:40PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> This series is for qemu 2.7, and will probably need some rework
> especially since some of it is trying to implement features
> that are still marked experimental in upstream NBD.
>
> Included are some interoperability bug fixes, code cleanups, then
> added support both client-side and server-side for:
> NBD_FLAG_C_NO_ZEROES
> NBD_CMD_WRITE_ZEROES
> NBD_CMD_CLOSE
Please hold off with the CLOSE implementation until the discussion on
that has finalized.
(not commenting on the rest of your series, since that's mostly
qemu-specific)
--
< ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem with C++, is there's like a dozen
people in the world who think they really understand all of its rules,
and pretty much all of them are just lying to themselves too.
-- #debian-devel, OFTC, 2016-02-12
Reply to: