[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Nbd] [PATCHv4] Document NBD_CMD_CLOSE



On 8 Apr 2016, at 04:31, Eric Blake <eblake@...696...> wrote:

> Should we be sticking this in the Experimental Extensions section, until
> we have an implementation?

Not every change needs go through 'experimental'.

You'll have an implementation in about 10 seconds if Wouter likes
this as I have it here. That's quicker than it would take me
to put it in an experimental section.

I'm happy also to look at the reference server.

The reference client is really the kernel (as nbdclient.c
doesn't send closes).

Would you be happy do do qemu's client?

--
Alex Bligh




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


Reply to: