On 04/04/2016 21:34, Eric Blake wrote: > At this point, I was just trying to rebase the proposal as originally > made by Denis and Pavel; perhaps they will have more insight on how they > envisioned using the command, or on whether we should try harder to make > this more of a two-way protocol (where the client can tell the server > when to mark something as clean, or when to start tracking whether > something is dirty). I don't think so, this command (if I understand correctly) is meant for the case where the dirty bitmap is static (e.g. the underlying image is read-only). Paolo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature