Re: [Nbd] [PATCH 2/2] Correct definition of NBD_CMD_FLAG_FUA
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 10:32:50AM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote:
> #define NBD_CMD_MASK_COMMAND 0x0000ffff
> -#define NBD_CMD_FLAG_FUA (1<<16)
> +#define NBD_CMD_SHIFT (16)
> +#define NBD_CMD_FLAG_FUA ((1 << 0) << NBD_CMD_SHIFT)
That works too, I suppose.
However, like I said, I need to clean this up anyway. I thought your
"will you take a patch" was going to do that, but if not, I'll get
around to doing it myself at some point...
--
< ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem with C++, is there's like a dozen
people in the world who think they really understand all of its rules,
and pretty much all of them are just lying to themselves too.
-- #debian-devel, OFTC, 2016-02-12
Reply to: