[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Nbd] [PATCH v3 4/5] doc: Propose STRUCTURED_REPLY extension



On 31 Mar 2016, at 14:44, Eric Blake <eblake@...696...> wrote:

> Another argument in favor of option #2: in v4, I plan to amend
> NBD_REPLY_TYPE_ERROR to explicitly allow the server to optionally send
> more than length 4 (and NBD_REPLY_TYPE_ERROR_OFFSET to send more than
> length 12) - anything beyond the fixed fields would then be a
> human-readable UTF-8 string (the same as we use for NBD_REP_ERR_*
> handshake replies).

Yeah I think this is the best route.

Also (hidden deep within my long comments), option #2 allows us
to (optionally) send offsets for errors in NBD_CMD_WRITE as well,
which is a substantial benefit.

--
Alex Bligh




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


Reply to: