> On 19 Dec 2016, at 21:54, Eric Blake <eblake@...696...> wrote: > > On 12/19/2016 03:41 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:09:42PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: >>> Eric's patch makes -d work again, but disables maxconnections in that >>> case. I'll need to fix it up; hopefully that'll happen sometime next >>> week, because otherwise I'll be too late to make the Debian freeze for >>> stretch, and I'd really like STARTTLS to be in there. >> >> I'm an idiot :-) >> >> When we say "don't fork", that means we cannot handle more than one >> connection, because we can't fork, and we do fork-per-child. >> >> I'll apply Eric's patch, it's the correct thing to do. > > I'm not sure if I broke the ACL handling in my patch, though, so you'll > want to double-check that aspect of it (I basically hardcoded -d to mean > that the ACL check would always succeed). Yeah that was my reason for not merging it. -- Alex Bligh
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail