Re: [Nbd] Proposal to merge WRITE_ZEROES extension into master
- To: Alex Bligh <alex@...872...>
- Cc: "nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net" <nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net>
- Subject: Re: [Nbd] Proposal to merge WRITE_ZEROES extension into master
- From: Wouter Verhelst <w@...112...>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 19:52:36 +0100
- Message-id: <20161214185236.sghyvjbsfxa7esun@...3...>
- In-reply-to: <75E8140C-3000-4500-89A4-71A26040ADE4@...872...>
- References: <BC48D5D1-550F-4EE3-BC84-623AE864FB3A@...872...> <20161214181434.ko22eeq6vnwpakh2@...3...> <75E8140C-3000-4500-89A4-71A26040ADE4@...872...>
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 06:20:57PM +0000, Alex Bligh wrote:
> Wouter,
> > Did the implementation of WRITE_ZEROES encounter any issues with the spec
> > that we might want to fix up? Or did things work out as expected?
>
> It was fine in nbdserver, and also fine in gonbdserver. Admittedly I didn't
> have a 'real' client to test it against.
Oh, I missed that part.
Is there a client anywhere that is more than a test thing? If not, then perhaps
hold off on merging for now until that exists too.
--
< ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem with C++, is there's like a dozen
people in the world who think they really understand all of its rules,
and pretty much all of them are just lying to themselves too.
-- #debian-devel, OFTC, 2016-02-12
Reply to: