Re: [Nbd] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] nbd: fix trim/discard commands with a length bigger than NBD_MAX_BUFFER_SIZE
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 04:08:50PM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote:
> What surprises me is that a release kernel is using experimental
> NBD extensions; there's no guarantee these won't change. Or does
> fstrim work some other way?
What makes you say NBD_CMD_TRIM is experimental? It's been implemented for
years.
--
< ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem with C++, is there's like a dozen
people in the world who think they really understand all of its rules,
and pretty much all of them are just lying to themselves too.
-- #debian-devel, OFTC, 2016-02-12
Reply to: