Re: [Nbd] [PATCH v5 2/2] doc: Add details on block sizes
- To: Eric Blake <eblake@...696...>
- Cc: "nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net" <nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net>
- Subject: Re: [Nbd] [PATCH v5 2/2] doc: Add details on block sizes
- From: Alex Bligh <alex@...872...>
- Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 18:21:12 +0100
- Message-id: <6D474D19-AB92-45DF-A94A-C6567163DC63@...872...>
- In-reply-to: <57150F81.1090703@...696...>
- References: <1460842265-21385-1-git-send-email-eblake@...696...> <1460842265-21385-3-git-send-email-eblake@...696...> <CF5BE3AC-3A44-4C3C-9C06-CBE6053CAEEF@...872...> <57150F81.1090703@...696...>
On 18 Apr 2016, at 17:46, Eric Blake <eblake@...696...> wrote:
> Do we really want BLOCK_SIZE and INFO to be on the same branch? Or is
> it feasible that INFO is close enough that we may be ready to merge it,
> while still wanting BLOCK_SIZE on its own branch?
>
> If the latter, then I can help with patches towards that split.
I thought about that. In general I think I would like to see them
together, but I can see counterarguments.
--
Alex Bligh
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Reply to: