Re: [Nbd] [PATCH v4] doc: Propose STRUCTURED_REPLY extension

[Wouter Verhelst <w@...112...>]

Did a few minor changes, though:

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:29:48PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> -S: 32 bits, 0x67446698, magic (`NBD_REPLY_MAGIC`)  
> -S: 32 bits, error  
> +S: 32 bits, 0x67446698, magic (`NBD_SIMPLE_REPLY_MAGIC`)  

Added a reference to the old name, for clarity.

[...]
> +- bit 6, `NBD_FLAG_SEND_DF`; defined by the `STRUCTURED_REPLY` extension;
> +  see below.

This is now bit 7 (we're already halfway through our available flags! time
flies...)

[...]
> +- bit 1, `NBD_CMD_FLAG_DF`; defined by the experimental `STRUCTURED_REPLY`
> +  extension; see below

This is now bit 2.

[...]

Regards,

-- 
< ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem with C++, is there's like a dozen
       people in the world who think they really understand all of its rules,
       and pretty much all of them are just lying to themselves too.
 -- #debian-devel, OFTC, 2016-02-12