Re: [Nbd] [PATCH v3 0/5] Structured replies

[Wouter Verhelst <w@...112...>]

Thanks, first three applied.

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 12:06:19AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> since v2:
> 
> more wording tweaks based on review comments, split out
> some independent cleanups that were observed during review,
> re-add NBD_FLAG_SEND_DF for ease of user/kernel split in
> client, allow NBD_REPLY_TYPE_NONE even after an error, more
> consistent use of the term 'chunk' to mean a message within
> a larger structured reply
> 
> Eric Blake (5):
>   doc: Minor consistency issues
>   doc: Clean up wording on UTF-8 and REP_SERVER usage
>   doc: Reformat description of Transmission phase
>   doc: Propose STRUCTURED_REPLY extension
>   RFC: doc: Promote structured reply out of experimental
> 
>  doc/proto.md | 397 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 349 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.5.5
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Transform Data into Opportunity.
> Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
> Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
> Click to learn more.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785471&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Nbd-general mailing list
> Nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nbd-general
> 

-- 
< ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem with C++, is there's like a dozen
       people in the world who think they really understand all of its rules,
       and pretty much all of them are just lying to themselves too.
 -- #debian-devel, OFTC, 2016-02-12