Re: [Nbd] [PATCH v2] nbd: Issue a uevent when disconnecting
- To: Markus Pargmann <mpa@...1897...>
- Cc: nbd-general <nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net>
- Subject: Re: [Nbd] [PATCH v2] nbd: Issue a uevent when disconnecting
- From: Wouter Verhelst <w@...112...>
- Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 18:28:08 +0100
- Message-id: <20160212172808.GC11701@...3...>
- In-reply-to: <2089906.hSTA6UrdgZ@...2153...>
- References: <1453566230-5786-1-git-send-email-w@...112...> <5247002.OuBHJMaBYj@...2153...> <20160205094241.GC6366@...3...> <2089906.hSTA6UrdgZ@...2153...>
[lkml dropped, no longer relevant]
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 03:49:32PM +0100, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> Hi Wouter,
>
> On Friday, February 05, 2016 10:42:41 AM Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Hi Markus,
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 10:03:41AM +0100, Markus Pargmann wrote:
> > > Hi Wouter,
> > >
> > > On Tuesday, February 02, 2016 04:27:00 PM Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > > There already is a uevent by default when closing a device upon connect
> > > > of the device. However, the same isn't true on disconnect.
> > > >
> > > > This makes it hard for userspace to keep track of whether a device is
> > > > connected, since we are notified when the connection is created, but not
> > > > when it is removed again.
> > > >
> > > > Explicitly issue a "change" uevent to remedy.
> > > >
> > > > [v2: incorporate feedback from udev maintainer and make sure that we
> > > > issue a uevent upon connect as well as disconnect, rather than connect
> > > > only]
> > >
> > > The systemd people had the same feedback.
> >
> > Well, the systemd people and the udev people are the same people these
> > days :-)
> >
> > > Basically the device is not marked as ready until a uevent is received. My
> > > idea was to use the size property consistently. If the device is connected
> > > the size is correctly changed and a uevent is created. On disconnect the size
> > > is set to 0 with another uevent.
> > >
> > > Does this work for you as well? I will send the patch as reply.
> >
> > Sure. What matters most is that the uevent is done; how it's done, less
> > so.
> >
> > I should add that this was meant to go with systemd #2422. I wasn't
> > aware of #358, or I would've talked to you more :-)
>
> Ah I see, thanks.
>
> I wrote some tests yesterday to ensure that I don't break other things
> with the new size calculations. I will send the pull request with this
> patch for 4.6.
Noted. Thank you.
For reference: the reason I'm interested in this is that I'm working on a
systemd unit for nbd-client, which is needed because of
<https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=796633>.
Regards,
--
It is easy to love a country that is famous for chocolate and beer
-- Barack Obama, speaking in Brussels, Belgium, 2014-03-26
Reply to: