Re: [Nbd] [PATCH 5/6] block: dasd_genhd: convert to blkdev_reread_part
- To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...1301...>
- Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...161...>, nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-s390@...25..., Stefan Haberland <stefan.haberland@...1296...>, Sebastian Ott <sebott@...1294...>, linux-kernel@...25..., Christoph Hellwig <hch@...1270...>, Fabian Frederick <fabf@...1980...>, Alexander Viro <viro@...1300...>, David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...17...>, Tejun Heo <tj@...1285...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...133...>
- Subject: Re: [Nbd] [PATCH 5/6] block: dasd_genhd: convert to blkdev_reread_part
- From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...696...>
- Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 09:46:55 -0400
- Message-id: <20150406134655.GE14217@...696...>
- In-reply-to: <1428218688-4092-6-git-send-email-ming.lei@...1301...>
- References: <1428218688-4092-1-git-send-email-ming.lei@...1301...> <1428218688-4092-6-git-send-email-ming.lei@...1301...>
On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 03:24:47PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Also remove the obsolete comment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...1301...>
> ---
> drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c | 9 +++------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c
> index 90f39f7..2af4619 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/block/dasd_genhd.c
> @@ -116,14 +116,11 @@ int dasd_scan_partitions(struct dasd_block *block)
> rc);
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> - /*
> - * See fs/partition/check.c:register_disk,rescan_partitions
> - * Can't call rescan_partitions directly. Use ioctl.
> - */
> - rc = ioctl_by_bdev(bdev, BLKRRPART, 0);
> +
> + rc = blkdev_reread_part(bdev);
> while (rc == -EBUSY && retry > 0) {
> schedule();
> - rc = ioctl_by_bdev(bdev, BLKRRPART, 0);
> + rc = blkdev_reread_part(bdev);
> retry--;
> DBF_DEV_EVENT(DBF_ERR, block->base,
> "scan partitions error, retry %d rc %d",
Note: patch 6/6 in the series makes this whole while() loops pointless,
since the possibility of the -EBUSY return goes away.
--
Jarod Wilson
jarod@...696...
Reply to: