On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 07:15:08PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:40:56AM +0000, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > Also, I suggest at least developing a prototype before releasing the > > specification changes. Issues that were unknown ahead of time might be > > discovered during development. > > Yeah, that's fair enough. > > > Why the rush to release specification changes? > > Not really a rush, I just thought it might be useful. But I suppose > you're right. > > Note that I'm not likely to be implementing this "soon". I haven't got > much time right now, and it would be my first time to implement > something which uses TLS; so I would need to do some research in that > area first. Hi Wouter, That's fine, thanks for putting together the draft spec. If someone I work with starts implementing NBD TLS we'll follow your spec and continue developing/discussing on the mailing list. Thanks, Stefan
Attachment:
pgpsoHzYTvlTN.pgp
Description: PGP signature