[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Nbd] [PATCH 2/3] nbd: fsync and kill block device on shutdown



On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...696...> wrote:
> There are two problems with shutdown in the NBD driver.  The first is
> that receiving the NBD_DISCONNECT ioctl does not sync the filesystem;
> this is useful because BLKFLSBUF is restricted to processes that have
> CAP_SYS_ADMIN, and the NBD client may not possess it (fsync of the
> block device does not sync the filesystem, either).

> The second is that once we clear the socket we have no guarantee that
> later reads will come from the same backing storage.  Thus the page cache
> must be cleaned, lest reads that hit on the page cache will return stale
> data from the previously-accessible disk.

Paolo,

Thanks for this. A problem indeed...

Acked-by: Paul.Clements@...124...


> Cc: <stable@...25...>
> Cc: <nbd-general@...72...>
> Cc: Paul Clements <Paul.Clements@...124...>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...133...>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...696...>
> ---
>  drivers/block/nbd.c |   10 ++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c
> index 5603765..a9c5c7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/nbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c
> @@ -608,12 +608,20 @@ static int __nbd_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, struct nbd_device *nbd,
>                 struct request sreq;
>
>                 dev_info(disk_to_dev(nbd->disk), "NBD_DISCONNECT\n");
> +               if (!nbd->sock)
> +                       return -EINVAL;
>
> +               mutex_unlock(&nbd->tx_lock);
> +               fsync_bdev(bdev);
> +               mutex_lock(&nbd->tx_lock);
>                 blk_rq_init(NULL, &sreq);
>                 sreq.cmd_type = REQ_TYPE_SPECIAL;
>                 nbd_cmd(&sreq) = NBD_CMD_DISC;
> +
> +               /* Check again after getting mutex back.  */
>                 if (!nbd->sock)
>                         return -EINVAL;
> +
>                 nbd_send_req(nbd, &sreq);
>                  return 0;
>         }
> @@ -627,6 +635,7 @@ static int __nbd_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, struct nbd_device *nbd,
>                 nbd_clear_que(nbd);
>                 BUG_ON(!list_empty(&nbd->queue_head));
>                 BUG_ON(!list_empty(&nbd->waiting_queue));
> +               kill_bdev(bdev);
>                 if (file)
>                         fput(file);
>                 return 0;
> @@ -719,6 +728,7 @@ static int __nbd_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, struct nbd_device *nbd,
>                 nbd->file = NULL;
>                 nbd_clear_que(nbd);
>                 dev_warn(disk_to_dev(nbd->disk), "queue cleared\n");
> +               kill_bdev(bdev);
>                 queue_flag_clear_unlocked(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, nbd->disk->queue);
>                 if (file)
>                         fput(file);
> --
> 1.7.1
>
>



Reply to: