Re: [Nbd] [PATCH 1/3] nbd: support FLUSH requests
- To: Nicolas Trangez <nicolas@...1262...>
- Cc: nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net
- Subject: Re: [Nbd] [PATCH 1/3] nbd: support FLUSH requests
- From: Wouter Verhelst <w@...112...>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 20:34:00 +0100
- Message-id: <20130212193400.GI11838@...3...>
- In-reply-to: <1360693346.9031.2.camel@...1263...>
- References: <1360685171-3792-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@...696...> <1360685171-3792-2-git-send-email-pbonzini@...696...> <115932E2-48BE-406E-9E75-61D12EB5937A@...872...> <511A8491.5030407@...696...> <1360693346.9031.2.camel@...1263...>
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 07:22:26PM +0100, Nicolas Trangez wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 19:06 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Il 12/02/2013 18:37, Alex Bligh ha scritto:
> > > For my education, why remove the FUA stuff?
> >
> > Because I had no way to test it.
> >
> > >>> > > Hmmm... the underlying storage could be md/dm RAIDs in which case FUA
> > >>> > > should be cheaper than FLUSH.
> > >> >
> > >> > If someone ever wrote a virtio-blk backend that sits directly ontop
> > >> > of the Linux block layer that would be true.
> > > In this case we don't know what the backend is sitting on top of
> > > a-priori. It might be the current nbd server code, but it might
> > > not be.
> >
> > Do you know of any other NBD server than the "official" one and qemu-nbd?
>
> Not used 'in production' (for now...), but yeah:
> https://github.com/NicolasT/nbd
there's also xnbd, whose author decided it would be better to
reimplement his own nbd-server from scratch.
--
Copyshops should do vouchers. So that next time some bureaucracy requires you
to mail a form in triplicate, you can mail it just once, add a voucher, and
save on postage.
Reply to: