Re: [Nbd] proposal
- To: Alex Bligh <alex@...872...>
- Cc: Wouter Verhelst <w@...112...>, nbd-general@...72...
- Subject: Re: [Nbd] proposal
- From: Paul Clements <paul.clements@...856...>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:22:51 -0400
- Message-id: <CAECXXi5B=0FLQ85wnc45S_MsHJgGkSMuQsGYY4u6CaXR3ONKgg@...18...>
- In-reply-to: <BFC3714A76229A8AEFE6D502@...873...>
- References: <CAFDOyVABADMhc54mtFGiqF__88Akb7Ou5tPsCEgK=m7R2OGk-g@...18...> <20110915071429.GD29036@...3...> <BFC3714A76229A8AEFE6D502@...873...>
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Alex Bligh <alex@...872...> wrote:
>
>> That sounds like something that could be done in the negotiation phase,
>> during the option haggling. I don't think I'd like to see this
>> afterwards.
>
> +1. Not least because the client by then is the kernel.
The (client) kernel can easily expose the flags/features on its end,
but I wouldn't take it further than that.
--
Paul
Reply to: