Re: [Nbd] Performance tuning of nbd !?
- To: Paul Clements <paul.clements@...124...>
- Cc: nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net
- Subject: Re: [Nbd] Performance tuning of nbd !?
- From: "Dirk von Suchodoletz" <dirk.von.suchodoletz@...65...>
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:28:21 +0100
- Message-id: <web-98178710@...164...>
- In-reply-to: <47C87472.8030806@...124...>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802282217000.5163@...163...> <47C83C11.8060401@...124...> <web-98178015@...164...> <47C87472.8030806@...124...>
Hi!
> > What does all these values mean exactly?
>
> It's minimum, default, and max memory size for send and receive windows.
>
> They're documented in the kernel docs in
> /usr/src/linux/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.tct
Okay, will give them a try :)
> >> The window size should be a little above your network "pipe size":
> >>
> >> pipe = bandwidth * latency
> >
> > Changed the values to the examples given ... but no change. Sticking to
> 130kB/s
> > at the moment.
>
> Sorry to hear that. I don't know of any other settings. These are the
> only ones I normally need to do. Can you achieve higher throughput with
> some other tool or protocol (scp, ftp, etc.)? Is there packet loss
> occurring?
SCP, FTP, HTTP streams achieve up to 1.3MByte/s. The packet loss is low to
non-existent (checked with wireshark) ... Thus I was irritated/disappointed to
see only 170kB yesterday and 128kB today ...
150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for windowsme.iso (391184384 bytes).
19% |********** | 75194 KB 1.43 MB/s 03:28 ETA
Downloading with this rate exactly from the same server :(
Hm, room for improvement :)) Dirk
Reply to: