Re: Adding support for LZIP to dpkg, using that instead of xz, archive wide
On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 10:07:18 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 06/14/2015 04:08 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 14:08:24 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>
>>> And by the way, xz wouldn't be usable with pristine-tar for the same
>>> reason.
>>
>> Ehm. pristine-xz(1) would beg to disagree.
>>
>> In the multimedia team, we use it for over 40 packages (where upstream
>> provides an xz file of course).
>>
>> I guess you should have a script that does git archive ; pristine-tar
>> commit.
>
> Did you try using the same pristine-tar xz thing but with a different
> version of xz-utils, for example the one in Trusty vs the one in Sid?
I have just checked out a tarball checked in on 2013-05-20 using current
sid. SHAs match. I do not have a trusty system to check.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
Reply to:
- References:
- Adding support for LZIP to dpkg, using that instead of xz, archive wide
- From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Re: Adding support for LZIP to dpkg, using that instead of xz, archive wide
- From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
- Re: Adding support for LZIP to dpkg, using that instead of xz, archive wide
- From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Re: Adding support for LZIP to dpkg, using that instead of xz, archive wide
- From: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>
- Re: Adding support for LZIP to dpkg, using that instead of xz, archive wide
- From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Re: Adding support for LZIP to dpkg, using that instead of xz, archive wide
- From: Felipe Sateler <fsateler@debian.org>
- Re: Adding support for LZIP to dpkg, using that instead of xz, archive wide
- From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>