Re: Bug#134658: ITP: lsb -- Linux Standard Base 1.1 core support package
At 2002/3/4 12:53-0700 Matt Taggart writes:
> > is appropriate for the normative parts of a standards).
>
> I agreee. While the FHS has done a good job including rationale in
> their spec, I think the rationale for the LSB will be much longer
> and warants a separate document.
>
I prefer the suggestion that someone made where we can build the spec
with or without the rationale (and perhaps the rationale without the
spec). At a minimum I think we should be able to mark the spec in the
places where there is a rationale available in a separate document.
Chris
--
cyeoh@au.ibm.com
IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group
Canberra, Australia
Reply to: