Re: Renaming the LSB? (was: Re: Specification v 0.8)

To: lsb-spec@lists.linuxbase.org
Cc: lsb-discuss@lists.linuxbase.org, lsb-spec@lists.linuxbase.org
Subject: Re: Renaming the LSB? (was: Re: Specification v 0.8)
From: "David L. Nicol" <david@kasey.umkc.edu>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 17:17:16 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 3AEDE46C.6CF430FF@kasey.umkc.edu>
References: <[🔎] E14uHec-0008JS-00@the-village.bc.nu> <[🔎] Pine.BSF.4.21.0104301405070.19885-100000@trantor.sc.metrolink.com> <[🔎] 20010430173228.B3769@zax.half.pint-stowp.cx>

so it becomes the L standard.  a BSD distribution could conform
to the L standard.  Would that make it the long awaited LSD?



-- 
                      David Nicol 816.235.1187 dnicol@cstp.umkc.edu
                                              Parse, munge, repeat.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Specification v 0.8
  - From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
- Re: Specification v 0.8
  - From: Stuart Anderson <anderson@metrolink.com>
- Renaming the LSB? (was: Re: Specification v 0.8)
  - From: Jim Knoble <jmknoble@jmknoble.cx>

Prev by Date: Re: Renaming the LSB? (was: Re: Specification v 0.8)
Next by Date: Re: Renaming the LSB? (was: Re: Specification v 0.8)
Previous by thread: Re: Renaming the LSB? (was: Re: Specification v 0.8)
Next by thread: Re: Specification v 0.8
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread