Re: LSB spec included commands

To: Daniel Quinlan <quinlan@pathname.com>
Cc: anderson@metrolink.com, lsb-spec@lists.linuxbase.org
Subject: Re: LSB spec included commands
From: Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld@dkuug.dk>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:11:11 +0100
Message-id: <20010227201111.A10099@rap.rap.dk>
In-reply-to: <15003.53791.930893.164490@proton.pathname.com>; from quinlan@pathname.com on Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 08:13:19AM -0800
References: <15003.53791.930893.164490@proton.pathname.com>

On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 08:13:19AM -0800, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> I propose making the following changes to the included commands list
> in the LSB database.
> 
> remove:
> 
>   uudecode (not needed)
>   uuencode (not needed)

I use uuencode/uudecode often, as microsoft products generates and
can read this, and I have scripts that uses it. I would like
it to stay.

Keld

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LSB spec included commands
  - From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>

References:
- LSB spec included commands
  - From: Daniel Quinlan <quinlan@pathname.com>

Prev by Date: Re: LSB spec included commands
Next by Date: Re: LSB spec included commands
Previous by thread: Re: LSB spec included commands
Next by thread: Re: LSB spec included commands
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread