Re: dbm symbols? In or out?
Matt Wilson <msw@redhat.com> writes:
> This is much more interesting:
>
> # db3
[...]
> This is just the way we have things configured - some packages can use
> various (incompatible) db interfaces. And we won't even start on the
> on-disk format incompatibilities...
Since db3 AFAIK support db2, db1 and ndbm, it should be sufficient to
settle to one interface - there's no need to document all of them.
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj
Reply to: