Re: Question about Facility names
> I don't think so, I think it is terrible. You mix script commands and
> meta information. So you need to read the whole file for dependencies. With
> the existing proposal you have all information in one place which is easy to
> maintain. And you have a strict separation of script commands and meta
> information.
That depends whether you treat the meta information as static evaluations
done at configure time or dynamic evaluations done at runtime.
If you wish to do the former then just alter the spec to say
# Provides: quake
# Requires: networking, 3d, large-guns
at the top of the files.
Reply to: