Re: [Freestandards-ldps] Re: LDPS 0.91 - even closer to release
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:
> > events (signals etc.) you don't need any additional locking neither,
> > because the normal locking of the task (grabbing exit_sem, task list lock etc.)
> > is enough.
>
> no. People assume it cant change during a syscall
There is nothing I could find in Single Unix nor in POSIX that requires that.
Who assumes that ? And if they do, do they assume the current per-thread
cred model too?
-Andi
Reply to: