[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: BUG in LSB-FHS-TS_SPEC



On Tue, 16 May 2000, Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Reference 3.4-15(A)
> > The implementation provides the file /etc/mtools
> > 
> > Should this be mtools.conf ?
> 
> Yes. But the question is, if the FHS is the right place to
> defines this config files.
>  
Exactly, mtools.conf is a config file for an application that is
not vital for the system.

while i agree for /etc/networks, /etc/hosts.allow and so, /etc/mtools.conf
is connected with mtools, and this is just an application,
should be the developers of this
application to decide /etc/mtools.conf or whatever. If they want to
change, like they did
in the past, they can do it.

Luigi Genoni



Reply to: