Re: [proofreading] Re: Initscripts management proposal
> > apmd atd crond dhclient dhcpcd gpm halt identd inet
> > httpd kudzu klogd lpd mcserv named nfs nfslock pcmcia
> > portmap random routed rstatd rusersd rwhod sendmail smb
> > snmpd sshd syslog xfs xntpd ypbind
>
> I'd object to 'httpd' instead of 'apache'. What If I want to run both
> roxen for normal sites and apache for SSL sites?
> Also it's not consistant with 'sendmail' (why not 'smtpd' then?)
The point surely is genericness
How can a vendor depend on apache being started when the user might have
thttpd instead for their cgi ?
Being able to say 'after httpd' knowing all the httpd daemons are up is
what you would want for say a web monitoring tool
> > pidofproc basename
>
> to be consistant with the other names those 2 functions should rather be
> named kill_proc and pid_of_proc IMHO...
Good point
Reply to: