Re: .rpm? .lsb??

To: lsb-spec@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: .rpm? .lsb??
From: Raul Miller <raul@usatoday.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 21:02:08 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19990926210208.A21770@usatoday.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19990926204336.R27669@quipu.earth>
References: <[🔎] 19990926180423.A17069@usatoday.com> <[🔎] 19990926183035.N27669@quipu.earth> <[🔎] 19990926201807.B20279@usatoday.com> <[🔎] 19990926204336.R27669@quipu.earth>

On Sun, Sep 26, 1999 at 08:43:36PM -0400, Jim Knoble wrote:
> The RPM *package format* hasn't changed significantly since rpm-2.4.x
> back in 1997.

Really?

*sigh*  I've been around far too long.

Ok, if it's been stable for a couple years I guess it's ok with me.

-- 
Raul

Reply to:

References:
- .rpm? .lsb??
  - From: Raul Miller <raul@usatoday.com>
- Re: .rpm? .lsb??
  - From: Jim Knoble <jmknoble@pobox.com>
- Re: .rpm? .lsb??
  - From: Raul Miller <raul@usatoday.com>
- Re: .rpm? .lsb??
  - From: Jim Knoble <jmknoble@pobox.com>

Prev by Date: Re: .rpm? .lsb??
Next by Date: Re: .rpm? .lsb??
Previous by thread: Re: .rpm? .lsb??
Next by thread: Re: .rpm? .lsb??
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread