Re: PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 2)

To: quinlan@transmeta.com (Daniel Quinlan)
Cc: alan@cymru.net, lsb-spec@lists.linuxbase.org
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 2)
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 00:11:01 +0100 (BST)
Message-id: <[🔎] E10pgdb-0002Kb-00@the-village.bc.nu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 6yvhd53yz6.fsf@sodium.transmeta.com> from "Daniel Quinlan" at Jun 3, 99 11:45:01 am

> Yes on the distinctive format.  Shell functions would be good.  But,
> you're not disagreeing that errors should go to stderr and non-errors
> should go to stdout, are you?

No

Reply to:

References:
- Re: PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 2)
  - From: Daniel Quinlan <quinlan@transmeta.com>

Prev by Date: Re: PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 2)
Next by Date: RE: PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 2)
Previous by thread: Re: PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 2)
Next by thread: Re: PROPOSAL: init file actions (draft 2)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread