Re: Resolutions to comments on LSB-FHS-TS_SPEC_V1.0
- To: Daniel Quinlan <quinlan@transmeta.com>
- Cc: Thomas Sippel - Dau <t.sippel-dau@ic.ac.uk>, alan@cymru.net, gordon.m.tetlow@vanderbilt.edu, florian@suse.de, hpa@transmeta.com, tytso@mit.edu, fhs-discuss@ucsd.edu, ajosey@rdg.opengroup.org, lsb-test@linuxbase.org, lsb-spec@linuxbase.org, lsb-spec@lists.linuxbase.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Resolutions to comments on LSB-FHS-TS_SPEC_V1.0
- From: Erik Troan <ewt@redhat.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 15:51:37 -0500 (EST)
- Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.04.9901251551060.2847-100000@mercury.devel.redhat.com>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 199901252009.MAA15770@sodium.transmeta.com>
On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> > Ten years.
>
> Are you serious? The Linux community has already made larger changes
> in far far less time. We're talking about modifying one or two lines
> in 10 or 20 source packages (like src RPMs).
You seem to be ignoring the upgrade issue. Allowing in-place upgrades
necessetates /var/spool/mail to exist in some form.
Erik
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| "For the next two hours, VH1 will be filled with foul-mouthed, |
| crossdressing Australians. Viewer discretion is advised." |
| |
| Linux Application Development -- http://www.redhat.com/~johnsonm/lad |
Reply to: