Re: A few questions
Viktor Ransmayr <viktor.ransmayr@i-dial.de> writes:
> Q1) Chapter 1: Related Standards
> What is the rationale for the choice of related standards ?
>
> - Is there a reason to use POSIX.1-1990 as the base, and not
> POSIX.1-1995 ?
Good question, I suspect this may be due to what test suites are
available. However, we should target the most recent POSIX.
> - Is there a need to distinguish between SUS.v1 ( UNIX95 )
> and SUS.v2 ( UNIX98 ) ?
Yes, there is.
> Q4) Chapter 9: Execution Environment
> What does the FHS2.0 have to do with the execution environment,
> i.e. shouldn't FHS allready be mentioned in chapter 2 ?
I would mention it with the other standards since the LSB isn't
exclusively a binary compatibility standard (POSIX.2 is also
referenced).
- Dan
Reply to: