[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: question on some test results



At 2002/7/22 16:39-0700  Wichmann, Mats D writes:
> 
> mproctect 17 on ia64 fails,  because by default non-text
> pages are not executable on Itanium.  I can supply an
> incantation that is run on the test binary which should
> change this, but I'm not sure that's the right approach.
> Does the spec actually require executable data or stack
> pages?  


There is no mprotect 17 test - do you mean testcase 4?

Chris
-- 
cyeoh@au.ibm.com
IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group
Canberra, Australia


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to lsb-impl-request@lists.linuxbase.org
with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email listmaster@lists.linuxbase.org



Reply to: