RE: Testing of lsbdev and sample implementation
Matt asked a lot of questions that I was busy asking, and I
hadn't seen his message, sorry for the duplication.
Here's another question:
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Taggart [mailto:taggart@carmen.fc.hp.com]
I personally am opposed to adding rsh, but I guess the argument could be
made
that the client half is probably "standard". I don't know how many
distributions install rsh-server by default though.
<<mats>> we can't possibly limit an LSB application from using
TCP/IP to connect to a well-known port somewhere else. Making
sure the right thing is listening becomes a problem that has to
be dealt with outside of the spec, right?
Reply to: