Re: Packaging stuff
On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, Nicholas Petreley wrote:
> * Stuart Anderson (email@example.com) [001024 18:01]:
> > Do you (and Nick) mean a C library with programming interfaces?
> I'm not. I'm talking about a documented procedural
> approach, or what I've called a protocol.
You have used a lot of different terms for the same thing in this thread. In
my vocabulary (and I believe this is shared by many others) each of these
terms has a very different meaning, and implies an entirely different solution.
Please don't just throw a bunch of terms around like a marketing person. It
creates a lot of confusion. We have been trying to sort out your suggestion,
but it has been a moving targets because of this.
Come up with a specific idea, and find the term that bests describes it, and
stick to that term.
In this particular case, (at least what I know think you meant), the solution
is to have a command interface that interfaces with the system package
This has been discussed, and agreed to in principle. I'm not sure that we
have yet nailed down every detail, hence it has not been added to the spec.
Please notice that the spec is at version 0.3, not 0.9. The minor number
is low because there is still much to be added. You're judgments on what
is there is somewhat premature.
Stuart R. Anderson firstname.lastname@example.org
Metro Link Incorporated South Carolina Office
5807 North Andrews Way 129 Secret Cove Drive
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 Lexington, SC 29072
voice: 954.660.2500 voice: 803.951.3630
fax: 954.938.1982 SkyTel: 800.405.3401