Re: OT: rude behaviour
On 2025-11-15, cat K. wrote:
> well you've got me there, you're right, that's what you did ask and I
> misunderstood. curse my optimism for thinking we were for a second
> talking about what software does instead of what it does not do. I
> also made numerous typos on my other reply to Nuno so let's nip that
> in the bud too while we're here; it's now Saturday afternoon where I
> am and that means I'm distracted, more on that later, so this is
> probably my last thought on the subject.
Typos happen. Also, there's the whole matter of caffeination, for those
who do enjoy a morning coffee.
[...]
> I look forward to having the same conversation when you all rise from
> your tombs next year.
I'm not sure we've agreed on a stable, consistent schedule for that yet,
things are in a bit of a mess ever since Google forced the clock to
start running again and got us into October, 1993, so these schedules
have to be revisited and translated to two more formats: ES-honoring
dates (are those on 1995 already?) and gregorian dates (currently in
2025), besides the neverending September calendar system they were
decided using.
(What are the dates in the neverending September system? No idea, given
I just made the whole thing up.)
--
Nuno Silva
Reply to: