On 28 Jan 2018, at 21:18, David Woodfall <dave@dawoodfall.net> wrote:
Well people still release specific versions even though they still may
make git commits every now and then. I wouldn't put down practises that
have been around for twenty years though. Things that are tried and
tested are fine.
Now normally I would agree with you because I'm an old beard :D and I really don't like to change my ways or anything really. But let me ask you this - how many changes are enough for me to release 2.6? 2.7? What comes after 2.9 - should it be 2.10 or 3.0? I understand versioning in projects where there are dozens of coders but it's quite insane and just a waste of time for a project of one.