Re: [gopher] History and future of "the gopher project"

To: Gopher Project Discussion <gopher-project@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [gopher] History and future of "the gopher project"
From: James Mills <prologic@shortcircuit.net.au>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 07:51:52 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] CALGqR9KeJuRTSq=p350A1KqxeE2K9M5voXwgkV_XSFF5H9yK_w@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Gopher Project Discussion <gopher-project@lists.alioth.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 201501231614.t0NGEYr113107280@floodgap.com>
References: <[🔎] 20150123161312.GC15193@pongonova.net> <[🔎] 201501231614.t0NGEYr113107280@floodgap.com>

On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:14 AM, Cameron Kaiser <spectre@floodgap.com> wrote:

Most of all, Gopher needs more content and more people participating with
servers.

I agree. If anyone is interested in the Gopher and it's continued survival

then they would be encouraged to setup their own Gopherspaces(s) with good content!

cheers

James

James Mills / prologic

E: prologic@shortcircuit.net.au

W: prologic.shortcircuit.net.au

_______________________________________________
Gopher-Project mailing list
Gopher-Project@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gopher-project

Reply to:

References:
- Re: [gopher] History and future of "the gopher project"
  - From: Brian Koontz <brian@pongonova.net>
- Re: [gopher] History and future of "the gopher project"
  - From: Cameron Kaiser <spectre@floodgap.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [gopher] bandwidth overhead for gopher
Next by Date: Re: [gopher] bandwidth overhead for gopher
Previous by thread: Re: [gopher] History and future of "the gopher project"
Next by thread: Re: [gopher] History and future of "the gopher project"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread