Well no... But still no reason to conform :-) On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Avery M. <averym@gmail.com> wrote: > ...except that using http:// for gopher makes little sense. :) > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Matthew Holevinski <eylusion@gmail.com> wrote: >> Honestly I think that's a fabulous idea. >> There's no reason gopher has to be restricted >> to Gopher://. > > >