[gopher] Re: Item Type Suggestions
Expediency is what always gets us into trouble. Does anyone remember the Y2K bug?
--- On Wed, 7/9/08, Jay Nemrow <jnemrow@quix.us> wrote:
From: Jay Nemrow <jnemrow@quix.us>
Subject: [gopher] Re: Item Type Suggestions
To: gopher@complete.org
Date: Wednesday, July 9, 2008, 12:28 AM
Although the philosophy of all of this just gets my heart beating faster,
Cameron has the perspective of the person actually coding all of this in the
real world client! I would just as soon have the client working smoothly as
to force it to obey a nice idea that makes coding a nightmare. Let the
programmer win the day!
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Cameron Kaiser <spectre@floodgap.com>
wrote:
>
> Here's the problem with that, though: the browser thinks in MIME
types.
> To get the proper MIME type out of a file that could be arbitrarily CSS,
> XML *or* HTML, you'd need to resort to content sniffing or extension
> grokking, which is what I want to avoid.
>
> I'm fully in agreement with your first paragraph, but for certain
tasks a
> 1:1 mapping is going to be unavoidable from an expediency point of view.
> At least for this specific case I cannot see a way of avoiding it.
>
> --
> ------------------------------------ personal:
> http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
> Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com *
> ckaiser@floodgap.com
> -- The only thing to fear is fearlessness -- R. E. M.
> -------------------------
>
>
>
Reply to: