[gopher] Re: GopherFS implementation questions
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 12 January 2002 12:15, you wrote:
<>
> All in all, I'm not quite sure if you _can_ represent Gopher in a FS
> structure. It will take some really ugly translation-step hack to say the
> least. Or you should of course be able to use Windows-like symlinking,
> which work non-transparently, just as you'd need it.
>
> And mind you, I haven't even fought the battle of Gopher+ yet... (I see
> material for a sequel here :-/)
I've been thinking about having a full-fledged Unix filesystem over Gopher.
Something that would include uids/gids and could be used as a replacement for
NFS. This would require Gopher+, though, and you couldn't drop in an
existing Gopher+ server for use as the main file server (though it probably
wouldn't need too much modification).
The nice thing about using Gopher+ as a filesysem is that you can have
full-fledged MIME types, not just relying on the filename extention.
- --
X windows: A mistake carried out to perfection.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjxAgmYACgkQqpueKcacfLT3sgCgjZ3owet1DC0VWN7ub05c5/ik
RW8An0OrJMH0pu6gXLUUS46QSoy304gR
=pEc4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: