John Goerzen: > > It's a shame that a lot of the feedback seems to rely on gopher+, as I > > understand it... or is it possible to do interesting applications with > > gopher alone? > Everything mentioned in my e-mails is possible with gopher (aka > gopher0) alone. So is the "mountable gopher filesystem" concept. Sorry, I was mixing two concepts in one email. Is interactivity (user input displays, etc) possible with gopher, or does it require gopher+? -- MJR