Hi, Julian already wrote the gist, but as I was done with the lengthy explanation then I saw his reply, here you go – or here you ignore, at your choice. Am Tue, Aug 05, 2025 at 11:39:31PM -0700, schrieb Pascal Martin: > Architectures: all armhf […] > SHA256: > a9171fbbb7b49c56050b11f1746b470b3de6527989dba506a59461f35439b10a 1996 main/binary-armhf/Packages.gz See: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianRepository/Format#MD5Sum.2C_SHA1.2C_SHA256 In particular: "If indexes are compressed, checksum data must be provided for uncompressed files as well, even if not present on the server." As to why you don't see apt complain: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianRepository/Format#Architectures "Clients should treat a missing entry for an architecture-specific index of a supported architecture as if that index file would exist, but is empty." That you list 'all' here might very well be another issue for your setup that you haven't encountered yet, detailed in the same section. If you must write your own server implementation, its a good idea to read at least that wiki page in its entirety. It might be more efficient to adapt one of the canopy of existing ones to your needs – although I can't give you a good suggestion as to which one as I am thoroughly spoiled and did write my own for testing proposes. Best regards David Kalnischkies
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature